![]() Kogan had given a verbal commitment, while Mr. In a further step, Facebook said Monday that it had hired a digital forensics firm “to determine the accuracy of the claims that the Facebook data in question still exists.” It said that Cambridge Analytica had agreed to the review and that Dr. We are suspending SCL/Cambridge Analytica, Wylie and Kogan from Facebook, pending further information.” If true, this is another unacceptable violation of trust and the commitments they made. We are moving aggressively to determine the accuracy of these claims. It said it had demanded and received certification that the data had been destroyed.įacebook also said: “Several days ago, we received reports that, contrary to the certifications we were given, not all data was deleted. ![]() Kogan’s research had been turned over to Cambridge Analytica, violating its terms of service, it removed Dr. The company issued a statement on Friday saying that in 2015, when it learned that Dr. The Times was recently able to view a set of raw data from the profiles Cambridge Analytica obtained. Kogan for violating Facebook’s rules and said it had deleted the information as soon as it learned of the problem two years ago.īut the data, or at least copies, may still exist. In a statement to The Times, the company acknowledged that it had acquired the data, though it blamed Dr. Kogan declined to provide The Times with details of what had happened, citing nondisclosure agreements with Facebook and Cambridge Analytica.Ĭambridge Analytica officials, after denying that they had obtained or used Facebook data, changed their story last week. So was Facebook hacked?įacebook in recent days has insisted that what Cambridge did was not a data breach, because it routinely allows researchers to have access to user data for academic purposes - and users consent to this access when they create a Facebook account.ĭr. Only about 270,000 users - those who participated in the survey - had consented to having their data harvested, though they were all told that it was being used for academic use.įacebook said no passwords or “sensitive pieces of information” had been taken, though information about a user’s location was available to Cambridge. He ultimately provided over 50 million raw profiles to the firm, said Christopher Wylie, a data expert who oversaw Cambridge Analytica’s data harvesting. Kogan built his own app and in June 2014 began harvesting data for Cambridge Analytica. ![]() The center declined to work with Cambridge Analytica, but Aleksandr Kogan, a Russian-American psychology professor at the university, was willing.ĭr. The technique had been developed at Cambridge University’s Psychometrics Center. Researchers in 2014 asked users to take a personality survey and download an app, which scraped some private information from their profiles and those of their friends, activity that Facebook permitted at the time and has since banned.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |